A Shared Cybersecurity Awareness Platform

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2021.154421

Keywords:

cybersecurity awareness, risk and threat propagation, threat intelligence

Abstract

Ensuring a good level of cybersecurity of global IT systems requires that specific procedures and cooperation frameworks be adopted for reporting threats and for coordinating the activities undertaken by individual entities. Technical infrastructure enabling safe and reliable online collaboration between all teams responsible for security is an important element of the system as well. With the above taken into consideration, the paper presents a comprehensive distributed solution for continuous monitoring and detection of threats that may affect services that provision is essential to security and broadly understood the state’s economic interests. The said solution allows to collect, process and share distributed knowledge on hazard events. The partnership-based model of cooperation between the system’s users allows the teams to undertake specific activities at the central level, facilitates global cyber threat awareness, and enhances the process of predicting and assessing cyber risks in order to ensure a near-real-time response. The paper presents an overview of the system’s architecture, its main components, features, and threat intelligence tools supporting the safe sharing of information concerning specific events. It also offers a brief overview of the system’s deployment and its testing in an operational environment of NASK’s Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) and Security Operation Center (SOC) of essential services operators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. M. Rinaldi, J. P. Peerenboom, and T. K. Kelly, “Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies”, IEEE Control Syst., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 11–25, 2001.
View in Google Scholar

[2] R. Zimmerman, “Decision-making and the vulnerability of interdependent critical infrastructure”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics The Hague, The Netherlands, 2004, vol. 5, pp. 4059–4063.
View in Google Scholar

[3] F. Petit and L. P. Lewis, “Incorporating logical dependencies and interdependencies into infrastructure analyses”, George Mason University, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://cip.gmu.edu/2016/02/17/incorporating-logical-dependencies-and-interdependencies-into-infrastructure-analyses/.
View in Google Scholar

[4] A. Nieuwenhuijs, E. Luiijf, and M. Klaver, “Modeling dependencies in critical infrastructures”, in Proc. IFIP Int. Federation for Informat. Process., 2008, pp. 205–213.
View in Google Scholar

[5] R. Setola, V. Rosato, E. Kyriakides, and E. Rome, Eds., Managing the Complexity of Critical Infrastructures. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 90. Springer, 2016.
View in Google Scholar

[6] C.-H. Han, S.-T. Park, and S.-J. Lee, “The enhanced security control model for critical infrastructures with the blocking prioritization process to cyber threats in power system”, Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., vol. 26, 2019.
View in Google Scholar

[7] G. Settanni et al., “A collaborative cyber incident management system for European interconnected critical infrastructures”, J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 34, pp. 166–182, 2017.
View in Google Scholar

[8] “Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union” [Online]. Available: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/1148/oj.
View in Google Scholar

[9] ETSI TR 103 456 v1.1.1, “Implementation of the network and information security (NIS) directive”, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_tr/103400_103499/103456/01.01.01_60/tr_103456v010101p.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

[10] CS-AWARE Project, Horizon 2020 Programme [Online]. Available: https://cs-aware.eu.
View in Google Scholar

[11] PROTECTIVE Project, Horizon 2020 Programme [Online]. Available: https://protective-h2020.eu.
View in Google Scholar

[12] S. Puuska et al., “Nationwide critical infrastructure monitoring using a common operating picture framework”, Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., vol. 20, pp. 28–47, 2018.
View in Google Scholar

[13] “Act on the national cybersecurity system”, J. of Laws, item 1560, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://uodo.gov.pl/en/file/307.
View in Google Scholar

[14] M. Kamola et al., “Decision support system for identification and security management of essential and digital services”, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Military Commun. and Informat. Systems (ICMCIS), Budva, Montenegro, 2019, pp. 1–7.
View in Google Scholar

[15] A. Karbowski et al., “Critical infrastructure risk assessment using Markov chain model”, J. of Telecommun. and Inform. Technol., no. 2, pp. 15–20, 2019.
View in Google Scholar

[16] K. Malinowski and A. Karbowski, “Hierarchical online risk assessment at national level”, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Military Commun. and Informat. Systems (ICMCIS), Budva, Montenegro, 2019, pp. 1–5.
View in Google Scholar

[17] M. Janiszewski et al., “A novel approach to national-level cyber risk assessment based on vulnerability management and threat intelligence”, J. of Telecommun. and Inform. Technol., no. 2, pp. 5–14, 2019.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Submitted

2023-05-15

Published

2021-09-30

Issue

Section

ARTICLES FROM THIS ISSUE

How to Cite

[1]
M. Amanowicz, “A Shared Cybersecurity Awareness Platform”, JTIT, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 32–41, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.26636/jtit.2021.154421.

Most read articles by the same author(s)