Stereoscopic 3DTV Video Quality Metric: the Compressed Average Image Intensity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2018.122917Keywords:
3D image analysis, image impairments, stereoscopy, video qualityAbstract
This paper presents a newly designed stereoscopic video quality metric. Overall insights towards the creation of mechanisms utilized within the genuine metric are presented herein. Delivery of the core information and motivation behind the features implemented, as well as functionality of the Compressed Average Image Intensity (CAII) quality metric are of utmost importance. The mechanisms created might be characterized as an objective, reliable and versatile quality evaluation tool for advanced analysis of the content delivery chain within stereoscopic video services.
Downloads
References
[1] Cisco Systems, “Cisco visual networking index: Forecast and methodology, 2015–2020”, Jun. 2016 [Online]. Available: http://bit.ly/295yXfL.
View in Google Scholar
[2] N. Fimić, S. Tanacković, J. Kovačević, and M. Temerinac, “Implementation of multi-format adaptive streaming server”, in Proc. 5th IEEE ICCE Berlin Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2015, pp. 218–220.
View in Google Scholar
[3] G. Wilczewski, “Analysis of content quality evaluation within 3DTV service distribution systems”, J. of Telecommun. and Inform. Technol., no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2014.
View in Google Scholar
[4] G. Wilczewski, “An objective method for a video quality evaluation of a 3DTV service”, in Proc. Symp. on Photonics Applic. in Astr., Commun., and High-Energy Physics Exper. Wilga 2015, Wilga, Poland, 2015, pp. 231–237.
View in Google Scholar
[5] D. Minoli, 3DTV Content Capture, Encoding and Transmission. New York: Wiley, 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[6] A. Vetro, T. Wiegand, and G. J. Sullivan, “Overview of the stereo and multiview video coding extensions of the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC standard”, Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 626–642, 2011.
View in Google Scholar
[7] G. Wilczewski, R. Mielowski, K. Perlicki, M. Siergiejczyk, and E. Kowalczyk, “Data Center resources monitoring for resilient telecommunication services”, Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, no. 91, pp. 225–228, 2015 (in Polish).
View in Google Scholar
[8] T. H. Luan, L. X. Cai, and X. S. Shen, “Impact of network dynamics on user’s video quality: Analytical framework and QoS provision”, IEEE Transact. on Multimedia, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–78, 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[9] R. A. Farrugia and C. J. Debono, “A hybrid error control and artifact detection mechanism for robust decoding of H.264/AVC video sequences”, IEEE Transact. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 756–762, 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[10] “Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement of HDTV for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference”, ITU-T J.341 Recommendation, 2016.
View in Google Scholar
[11] T. Tian, X. Jiang, and X. Du, “Subjective quality assessment of compressed 3D video”, in Proc. 7th Int. Congress on Image and Signal Proces. CISP, Dalian, Liaoning, China, 2014, pp. 606–611.
View in Google Scholar
[12] “Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures”, ITU-R BT.500-13 Recommendation, 2012.
View in Google Scholar
[13] “Subjective assessment methods for 3D video quality”, ITU-T P.915 Recommendation, 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
