Call and Connections Times in ASON/GMPLS Architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2013.3.1227Keywords:
ASON, call control, call time, connection control, connection time, GMPLS, simulation modelAbstract
It is assumed that demands of information society could be satisfied by architecture ASON/GMPLS comprehended as Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) protocols. Introduction this solution must be preceded by performance evaluation to guarantee society expectations. Call and connections times are in ASON/GMPLS architecture important for real-time applications. Practical realization is expensive and simulations models are necessary to examine standardized propositions. This paper is devoted to the simulation results of ASON/GMPLS architecture control plane functions in OMNeT++ discrete event simulator. The authors make an effort to explore call/connection set-up times, connection release times in a single domain of ASON/GMPLS architecture.
Downloads
References
[1] „Architecture for the automatically switched optical network”, ITU-T Rec. G.8080/Y.1304, Feb. 2012.
View in Google Scholar
[2] E. Mannie, „Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture”, IETF RFC 3945, Oct. 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[3] A. Farrel and I. Bryskin, GMPLS: Architecture and Applications. Morgan Kaufmann, 2006.
View in Google Scholar
[4] „Distributed Call and Connection Management: Signalling mechanism using GMPLS RSVP-TE”, ITU-T Rec. G.7713.2/Y.1704.2, Mar. 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[5] „Signaling Protocol Interworking of ASON/GMPLS Network Domains”, OIF Guideline Document, Jun. 2008.
View in Google Scholar
[6] „ASON routing architecture and requirements for link state protocol”, ITU-T Rec. G.7715.1/Y.1706.1, Feb. 2004.
View in Google Scholar
[7] „OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)”, K. Kompella and Y. Rekhter, Eds., IETF RFC 4203, Oct. 2005.
View in Google Scholar
[8] A. Jajszczyk, „Automatically switched optical networks: Benefits and Requirements”, IEEE Opt. Commun., pp. 510-515, Feb. 2005.
View in Google Scholar
[9] S. Kaczmarek, M. Narloch, M. Młynarczuk, and M. Sac, „The Realization of NGN Architecture for ASON/GMPLS Network”, J. Telecommun. Inform. Technol. (JTIT), no. 3, pp. 47-56, 2011.
View in Google Scholar
[10] S. Kaczmarek, M. Narloch, M. Młynarczuk, and M. Sac, „Evaluation of ASON/GMPLS Connection Control Servers Performance”, in Information Systems Architecture and Technology, Service Oriented Network Systems. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2011, pp. 267-278.
View in Google Scholar
[11] „Functional Requirements and architecture for next generation networks”, ITU-T Rec. Y.2012, Apr. 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[12] „OMNeT++ Network Simulation Framework” [Online]. Available: www.omnetpp.org
View in Google Scholar
[13] H. Zang, J. P. Jue, and B. Mukherjee, „A Review of Routing and Wavelength Assignment Approaches for Wavelength Routed Optical WDM Networks”, Opt. Netw. Mag., pp. 47-60, Jan. 2000.
View in Google Scholar
[14] Network library, Zuse Institut Berlin [Online]. Available: http://sndlib.zib.de/
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.