Call and Connections Times in ASON/GMPLS Architecture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2013.3.1227

Keywords:

ASON, call control, call time, connection control, connection time, GMPLS, simulation model

Abstract

It is assumed that demands of information society could be satisfied by architecture ASON/GMPLS comprehended as Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) protocols. Introduction this solution must be preceded by performance evaluation to guarantee society expectations. Call and connections times are in ASON/GMPLS architecture important for real-time applications. Practical realization is expensive and simulations models are necessary to examine standardized propositions. This paper is devoted to the simulation results of ASON/GMPLS architecture control plane functions in OMNeT++ discrete event simulator. The authors make an effort to explore call/connection set-up times, connection release times in a single domain of ASON/GMPLS architecture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] „Architecture for the automatically switched optical network”, ITU-T Rec. G.8080/Y.1304, Feb. 2012.
View in Google Scholar

[2] E. Mannie, „Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture”, IETF RFC 3945, Oct. 2004.
View in Google Scholar

[3] A. Farrel and I. Bryskin, GMPLS: Architecture and Applications. Morgan Kaufmann, 2006.
View in Google Scholar

[4] „Distributed Call and Connection Management: Signalling mechanism using GMPLS RSVP-TE”, ITU-T Rec. G.7713.2/Y.1704.2, Mar. 2003.
View in Google Scholar

[5] „Signaling Protocol Interworking of ASON/GMPLS Network Domains”, OIF Guideline Document, Jun. 2008.
View in Google Scholar

[6] „ASON routing architecture and requirements for link state protocol”, ITU-T Rec. G.7715.1/Y.1706.1, Feb. 2004.
View in Google Scholar

[7] „OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)”, K. Kompella and Y. Rekhter, Eds., IETF RFC 4203, Oct. 2005.
View in Google Scholar

[8] A. Jajszczyk, „Automatically switched optical networks: Benefits and Requirements”, IEEE Opt. Commun., pp. 510-515, Feb. 2005.
View in Google Scholar

[9] S. Kaczmarek, M. Narloch, M. Młynarczuk, and M. Sac, „The Realization of NGN Architecture for ASON/GMPLS Network”, J. Telecommun. Inform. Technol. (JTIT), no. 3, pp. 47-56, 2011.
View in Google Scholar

[10] S. Kaczmarek, M. Narloch, M. Młynarczuk, and M. Sac, „Evaluation of ASON/GMPLS Connection Control Servers Performance”, in Information Systems Architecture and Technology, Service Oriented Network Systems. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 2011, pp. 267-278.
View in Google Scholar

[11] „Functional Requirements and architecture for next generation networks”, ITU-T Rec. Y.2012, Apr. 2010.
View in Google Scholar

[12] „OMNeT++ Network Simulation Framework” [Online]. Available: www.omnetpp.org
View in Google Scholar

[13] H. Zang, J. P. Jue, and B. Mukherjee, „A Review of Routing and Wavelength Assignment Approaches for Wavelength Routed Optical WDM Networks”, Opt. Netw. Mag., pp. 47-60, Jan. 2000.
View in Google Scholar

[14] Network library, Zuse Institut Berlin [Online]. Available: http://sndlib.zib.de/
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Submitted

2023-06-28

Published

2013-09-30

Issue

Section

ARTICLES FROM THIS ISSUE

How to Cite

[1]
S. Kaczmarek, M. Młynarczuk, and P. Zieńko, “Call and Connections Times in ASON/GMPLS Architecture”, JTIT, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 80–88, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.26636/jtit.2013.3.1227.

Most read articles by the same author(s)