SHaPe: A Honeypot for Electric Power Substation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2015.4.983Keywords:
cybersecurity, IEC 61850, honeypots, SCADAAbstract
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems play a crucial role in national critical infrastructures, and any failure may result in severe damages. Initially SCADA networks were separated from other networks and used proprietary communications protocols that were well known only to the device manufacturers. At that time such isolation and obscurity ensured an acceptable security level. Nowadays, modern SCADA systems usually have direct or indirect Internet connection, use open protocols and commercial-off-the-shelf hardware and software. This trend is also noticeable in the power industry. Present substation automation systems (SASs) go beyond traditional SCADA and employ many solutions derived from Information and Communications Technology (ICT). As a result electric power substations have become more vulnerable for cybersecurity attacks and they need ICT security mechanisms adaptation. This paper shows the SCADA honeypot that allows detecting unauthorized or illicit traffic in SAS which communication architecture is defined according to the IEC 61850 standard.
Downloads
References
[1] W. Rebizant, J. Szafran, and A. Wiszniewski, Digital Signal Processing in Power System Protection and Control. Springer, 2013.
View in Google Scholar
[2] T. M. Chen and S. Abu-Nimeh, “Lessons from Stuxnet”, IEEE Comp., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 91–93, 2011.
View in Google Scholar
[3] “ICS-CERT Year in Review 2014”, Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/Year-Review-2014
View in Google Scholar
[4] T. Sommestad, G. N. Ericsson, and J. Nordlander, “SCADA System cyber security – A comparison of standards”, in Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meet., Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[5] L. Spitzner, “Honeypots: catching the insider threat”, in Proc. 19th Ann. Comp. Secur. Appl. Conf. ACSAC 2003, Washington, DC, USA, 2003, pp. 170–179.
View in Google Scholar
[6] P. Simões, T. Cruz, J. Gomes, and E. Monteiro, “On the use of honeypots for detecting cyber attacks on industrial control networks”, in Proc. 12th Eur. Conf. Inform. Warfare Secur. ECIW 2013, Jyväskylä, Finland, 2013.
View in Google Scholar
[7] L. Spitzner, Honeypots: Tracking Hackers. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
View in Google Scholar
[8] V. Pothamsetty and M. Franz, “SCADA HoneyNet Project: Building Honeypots for Industrial Networks”, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://scadahoneynet.sourceforge.net/
View in Google Scholar
[9] The Honeyd website [Online]. Available: http://www.honeyd.org
View in Google Scholar
[10] The SCADA Honeynet website [Online]. Available: http://www.digitalbond.com/tools/scada-honeynet
View in Google Scholar
[11] K. Wilhoit, “Who’s Really Attacking ICS Equipment?”, Trend Micro Research, Cupertino, CA, USA, 2013.
View in Google Scholar
[12] The Conpot website [Online]. Available: http://www.conpot.org
View in Google Scholar
[13] The Ghost USB honeypot website [Online]. Available: http://code.google.com/p/ghost-usb-honeypot
View in Google Scholar
[14] “Communication networks and systems for power utility automation – Part 7-1: Basic communication structure – Principles and models”, IEC 61850-7-1, 2011.
View in Google Scholar
[15] “Communication networks and systems for power utility automation – Part 7-2: Basic information and communication structure – Abstract communication service interface (ACSI)”, IEC 61850-7-2, 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[16] “Communication networks and systems for power utility automation – Part 8-1: Specific communication service mapping – Mappings to MMS (ISO 9506-1 and ISO 9506-2) and to ISO/IEC 8802-3”, IEC 61850-8-1, 2011.
View in Google Scholar
[17] “Communication networks and systems for power utility automation – Part 6: Configuration description language for communication in electrical substations related to IEDs”, IEC 61850-6, 2010.
View in Google Scholar
[18] K. Gorzelak et al., “Proactive Detection of Security Incidents”, Tech. Rep., ENISA, 2012.
View in Google Scholar
[19] The Dionaea website [Online]. Available: http://dionaea.carnivore.it
View in Google Scholar
[20] The libiec61850 website [Online]. Available: http://libiec61850.com
View in Google Scholar
[21] The SHaPe project website [Online]. Available: https://www.assembla.com/spaces/scada-honeypot
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.