Reference Point Method with Importance Weighted Partial Achievements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2008.4.893Keywords:
aggregation methods, multicriteria decision making, reference point method, WOWAAbstract
The reference point method (RPM) is based on the so-called augmented max-min aggregation where the worst individual achievement maximization process is additionally regularized with the average achievement. In order to avoid inconsistencies caused by the regularization, we replace it with the ordered weighted average (OWA) which combines all the individual achievements allocating the largest weight to the worst achievement, the second largest weight to the second worst achievement, and so on. Further following the concept of the weighted OWA (WOWA) we incorporate the importance weighting of several achievements into the RPM. Such a WOWA RPM approach uses importance weights to affect achievement importance by rescaling accordingly its measure within the distribution of achievements rather than by straightforward rescaling of achievement values. The recent progress in optimization methods for ordered averages allows us to implement the WOWA RPM quite effectively as extension of the original constraints and criteria with simple linear inequalities.
Downloads
References
[1] A. P. Wierzbicki, „A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making”, Math. Model., vol. 3, pp. 391-405, 1982.
View in Google Scholar
[2] J. Granat and M. Makowski, „ISAAP - interactive specification and analysis of aspiration-based preferences”, Eur. J. Opnl. Res., vol. 122, pp. 469-485, 2000.
View in Google Scholar
[3] A. Lewandowski and A. P. Wierzbicki, Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems - Theory, Software and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 1989.
View in Google Scholar
[4] W. Ogryczak and S. Lahoda, „Aspiration/reservation decision support - a step beyond goal programming”, J. MCDA, vol. 1, pp. 101-117, 1992.
View in Google Scholar
[5] A. P. Wierzbicki, M. Makowski, and J. Wessels, Model-Based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000.
View in Google Scholar
[6] W. Ogryczak and T. Śliwiński, „On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective”, Eur. J. Opnl. Res., vol. 148, pp. 80-91, 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[7] V. Torra, „The weighted OWA operator”, Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 12, pp. 153-166, 1997.
View in Google Scholar
[8] F. Ruiz, M. Luque, and J. M. Cabello, „A classification of the weighting schemes in reference point procedures for multiobjective programming”, J. Opnl. Res. Soc., 2008 (forthcoming), doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602577.
View in Google Scholar
[9] A. P. Wierzbicki, „On completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems”, OR Spectrum, vol. 8, pp. 73-87, 1986.
View in Google Scholar
[10] K. Miettinen and M. M. Mäkelä, „On scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization”, OR Spectrum, vol. 24, pp. 193-213, 2002.
View in Google Scholar
[11] W. Ogryczak, „Preemptive reference point method”, in Multicriteria Analysis - Proceedings of the XIth International Conference on MCDM, J. Climaco, Ed. Berlin: Springer, 1997, pp. 156-167.
View in Google Scholar
[12] W. Ogryczak, K. Studziński, and K. Zorychta, „DINAS: a computer-assisted analysis system for multiobjective transshipment problems with facility location”, Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 19, pp. 637-647, 1992.
View in Google Scholar
[13] R. R. Yager, „On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making”, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cyber., vol. 18, pp. 183-190, 1988.
View in Google Scholar
[14] R. R. Yager, „On the analytic representation of the Leximin ordering and its application to flexible constraint propagation”, Eur. J. Opnl. Res., vol. 102, pp. 176-192, 1997.
View in Google Scholar
[15] W. Ogryczak, „On goal programming formulations of the reference point method”, J. Opnl. Res. Soc., vol. 52, pp. 691-698, 2001.
View in Google Scholar
[16] W. Ogryczak and A. Tamir, „Minimizing the sum of the k largest functions in linear time”, Inform. Proc. Let., vol. 85, pp. 117-122, 2003.
View in Google Scholar
[17] X. Liu, „Some properties of the weighted OWA operator”, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. B, vol. 36, pp. 118-127, 2006.
View in Google Scholar
[18] W. Ogryczak and T. Śliwiński, „On optimization of the importance weighted OWA aggregation of multiple criteria”, in International Conference Computational Science and Its Applications ICCSA 2007, LNCS, vol. 4705. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, pp. 804-817.
View in Google Scholar
[19] W. Ogryczak and T. Śliwiński, „On decision support under risk by the WOWA optimization”, in Ninth European Conference on Symbolic and Qualitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty ECSQARU 2007, LNAI, vol. 4724. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, pp. 779-790.
View in Google Scholar
[20] W. Ogryczak and A. Ruszczyński, „Dual stochastic dominance and related mean-risk models”, SIAM J. Opt., vol. 13, pp. 60-78, 2002.
View in Google Scholar
[21] M. M. Kostreva, W. Ogryczak, and A. Wierzbicki, „Equitable aggregations and multiple criteria analysis”, Eur. J. Opnl. Res., vol. 158, pp. 362-367, 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.