Modeling the Geometry of an Underwater Channel for Acoustic Communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2022.164822

Keywords:

channel impulse response, geometry channel model, multipath propagation, underwater acoustic communication

Abstract

The achievement of efficient data transmissions via underwater acoustic channels, while dealing with large data packets and real-time data fed by underwater sensors, requires a high data rate. However, diffraction, refraction, and reflection phenomena, as well as phase and amplitude variations, are common problems experienced in underwater acoustic (UWA) channels. These factors make it difficult to achieve high-speed and long-range underwater acoustic communications. Due to multipath interference caused by surface and ocean floor reflections, the process of modeling acoustic channels under the water’s surface is of key importance. This work proposes a simple geometry-based channel model for underwater communication. The impact that varying numbers of reflections, low water depth values, and distances between the transmitter and the receiver exert on channel impulse response and transmission loss is examined. The high degree of similarity between numerical simulations and actual results demonstrates that the proposed model is suitable for describing shallow underwater acoustic communication environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Stojanovic and J. Preisig, “Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization”, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2009.
View in Google Scholar

[2] A. E. Abdelkareem, B. S. Sharif, C. C. Tsimenidis, and J. A. Neasham, “Time varying Doppler-shift compensation for OFDM-based shallow underwater acoustic communication systems”, in Proc. 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, 2011, pp. 885–891.
View in Google Scholar

[3] J. Heidemann, M. Stojanovic, and M. Zorzi, “Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, vol. 370, pp. 158–175, 2012.
View in Google Scholar

[4] J. Hui and X. Sheng, “Reverberation channel”, in Underwater Acoustic Channel. Singapore: Springer, 2022, pp. 175–191.
View in Google Scholar

[5] R. F. Coates, “Underwater acoustic communication”, Sea Technol., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 41–47, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://archive.org/details/sim_sea-technology_1994-07_35_7/page/n3/mode/2up.
View in Google Scholar

[6] M. Elamassie, F. Miramirkhani, and M. Uysal, “Channel modeling and performance characterization of underwater visible light communications”, in Proc. 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Commun. Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2018, pp. 1–5.
View in Google Scholar

[7] Y. Widiarti, Suwadi, Wirawan, and T. Suryani, “A geometry-based underwater acoustic channel model for time reversal acoustic communication”, in Proc. 2018 Int. Semin. on Intell. Technol. and Its Appl. ISITIA 2018, 2018, pp. 345–350.
View in Google Scholar

[8] J. Zhou, H. Jiang, P. Wu, and Q. Chen, “Study of propagation channel characteristics for underwater acoustic communication environments”, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 79438–79445, 2019.
View in Google Scholar

[9] M. Rawat, B. Lall, and S. Srirangarajan, “Angle of arrival distribution in an underwater acoustic communication channel with incoherent scattering”, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 133204–133211, 2020.
View in Google Scholar

[10] X. Zhu, C. X. Wang, and R. Ma, “A 2D non-stationary channel model for underwater acoustic communication systems”, in Proc. IEEE 93rd Veh. Technol. Conf. VTC2021-Spring, 2021, pp. 1–5.
View in Google Scholar

[11] A. E. Abdelkareem, B. S. Sharif, and C. C. Tsimenidis, “Adaptive time varying Doppler shift compensation algorithm for OFDM-based underwater acoustic communication systems”, Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 45, pp. 104–119, 2016.
View in Google Scholar

[12] Y. Lou and N. Ahmed, “Basic principles of underwater acoustic communication”, in Underwater Communications and Networks. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 3–33.
View in Google Scholar

[13] R. F. W. Coates, Underwater Acoustic Systems. Wiley, 1990 (ISBN: 9780470215449).
View in Google Scholar

[14] D. Porta, “Underwater acoustic communications”, Sea Technol., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 49–55, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://archive.org/details/sim_sea-technology_1998-02_39_2/page/n3/mode/2up.
View in Google Scholar

[15] N. Morozs et al., “Channel modeling for underwater acoustic network simulation”, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 136151–136175, 2020.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Submitted

2023-05-07

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

ARTICLES FROM THIS ISSUE

How to Cite

[1]
H. A. Naman and A. Abdelkareem, “Modeling the Geometry of an Underwater Channel for Acoustic Communication”, JTIT, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 3–12, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.26636/jtit.2022.164822.