Coordination Games with Communication Costs in Network Environments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26636/jtit.2010.2.1077

Keywords:

communication costs, coordination games, equilibrium, networks

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with a coordination game in a network where a player can choose both an action of the game and partners for playing the game. In particular, a player interacts with players connecting through a path consisting of multiple links as well as with players directly connecting by a single link. We represent decay or friction of payoffs with distance as communication costs, and examine the effect of the communication cost on behavior of players in the game and network formation. We investigate properties of equilibrium networks by classifying the link cost and the communication cost, and show diversity of the equilibrium networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. O. Jackson and A. Watts, “On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games”, Games Econom. Behav., vol. 41, pp. 265–291, 2002.
View in Google Scholar

[2] S. Goyal and F. Vega-Redondo, “Network formation and social coordination”, Games Econom. Behav., vol. 50, pp. 178–20, 2005.
View in Google Scholar

[3] D. A. Hojman and A. Szeidl, “Endogenous networks, social games, and evolution”, Games Econom. Behav., vol. 55, pp. 112–130, 2006.
View in Google Scholar

[4] M. Kandori, G. J. Mailath, and R. Rob, “Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games”, Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 29–56, 1993.
View in Google Scholar

[5] H. P. Young, “The evolution of conventions”, Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 57–84, 1993.
View in Google Scholar

[6] G. Ellison, “Learning, local interaction, and coordination”, Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 1047–1071, 1993.
View in Google Scholar

[7] E. Droste, R. P. Gilles, and C. Johnson, “Evolution of conventions in endogenous social networks”, 2004 [Mimeo].
View in Google Scholar

[8] G. Fagiolo, “Endogenous neighborhood formation in a local coordination model with negative network externalities”, J. Econom. Dynam. Contr., vol. 29, pp. 297–319, 2005.
View in Google Scholar

[9] J. Oechssler, “Competition among conventions”, Computat. Mathem. Organiz. Theor., vol. 5, pp. 31–44, 1999.
View in Google Scholar

[10] J. C. Ely, “Local conventions”, Adv. Theor. Econom., vol. 2, pp. 1–30, 2002.
View in Google Scholar

[11] V. Bhaskar and F. Vega-Redondo, “Migration and the evolution of conventions”, J. Econom. Behav. Organiz., vol. 55, pp. 397–418, 2004.
View in Google Scholar

[12] M. O. Jackson and A. Wolinsky, “A strategic model of social and economic networks”, J. Econom. Theor., vol. 71, pp. 44–74, 1996.
View in Google Scholar

[13] V. Bala and S. Goyal, “A noncooperative model of network formation”, Econometrica, vol. 68, pp. 1181–1229, 2000.
View in Google Scholar

[14] C. Kim and K. Wong, “Network formation and stable equilibrium”, J. Econom. Theor., vol. 133, pp. 536–549, 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Submitted

2023-06-27

Published

2010-06-30

Issue

Section

ARTICLES FROM THIS ISSUE

How to Cite

[1]
I. Nishizaki, T. Hayashida, and N. Hara, “Coordination Games with Communication Costs in Network Environments”, JTIT, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 88–98, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.26636/jtit.2010.2.1077.

Most read articles by the same author(s)